Deviant Login Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
June 20, 2013
Image Size
424 KB
Resolution
1500×400
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
3,943 (2 today)
Favourites
64 (who?)
Comments
21
Downloads
32
×
luizvc's Custom Pokemon Type Symbols by ILKCMP luizvc's Custom Pokemon Type Symbols by ILKCMP
After checking out my original Pokémon type symbol sheet ( [link] ), ~luizvc was interested in seeing a few of his custom types done in the style.

From left to right, we have Fossil (a nautilus shell), ??? (negative space question mark), Arcane (stylized omega), Cosmic (shooting star, part of my original set of symbols but this time with a new color), and Cyber (1s and 0s: binary code).


The '???' symbol slightly resembles a bird...I may have to remake my Missingno. card (can be a good symbol for Bird-type!).


Any questions regarding the types should be directed at him; all I did was create the symbols. Please download for full view!


Enjoy!


Pokémon © 1995-2013 Nintendo/Creatures Inc./GAME FREAK Inc. Pokémon and Pokémon character names are trademarks of Nintendo.
Add a Comment:
 
:icontommypezmaster:
Tommypezmaster Featured By Owner May 4, 2014
How ya make these?
Reply
:iconilkcmp:
ILKCMP Featured By Owner May 4, 2014
Just different layer effects in Photoshop, nothing too fancy!
Reply
:iconkinzoku-dejitaru:
Kinzoku-Dejitaru Featured By Owner Jan 15, 2014
Cyber-Type. Awesome -w-
Reply
:iconnightbluesky:
NightBlueSky Featured By Owner Dec 10, 2013  Student General Artist
Is the word Arcane are the another meaning for magic?

It's would be nice to have a Pokemon who has a magic for elemental type.
Reply
:iconilkcmp:
ILKCMP Featured By Owner Dec 10, 2013
You'd have to ask the guy I made the symbols for, but yes, I would assume he was going for a magic-like type.
Reply
:iconrockoandhamtarofan64:
An Error one (representing Glitch type) would probably be some jumbled mess of the eleven official TCG types.
Reply
:iconilkcmp:
ILKCMP Featured By Owner Nov 12, 2013
It would probably be pretty hard to make that into something that looks coherent and not just a mess of color...especially at such small sizes that would be necessary for cards.
Reply
:iconrockoandhamtarofan64:
Not necessarily the color, but the symbol.
Reply
:iconilkcmp:
ILKCMP Featured By Owner Nov 12, 2013
Even so, at such small sizes the details from each symbol would be lost and the result would just look like a blob with bits and pieces sticking out of it. It's a good thought (that could possibly work at large sizes), but not when you're dealing with something a quarter-inch (or smaller) across.
Reply
:iconrockoandhamtarofan64:
Yeah, it'd probably look better as a jumbled mess of its own rather than a jumbled mess of other symbols...
Reply
Add a Comment: